![]() –Wife Chaz Ebert: “I am devastated by the loss of my love, Roger – my husband, my friend, my confidante and oh-so-brilliant partner of over 20 years. Most celebrities are devoid of interest.” – “I am utterly bored by celebrity interviews. ![]() Which means that the whole mainstream Hollywood product has been skewed toward violence and vulgar teen comedy.” – “If a movie isn’t a hit right out of the gate, they drop it. ![]() – “If you have to ask what it symbolizes, it didn’t.” – “No good movie is too long and no bad movie is short enough.” – “Every great film should seem new every time you see it.” – Giving no love to “Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith”: “To say that George Lucas cannot write a love scene is an understatement greeting cards have expressed more passion.” – Reviewing “Crocodile Dundee II”: “I’ve seen audits that were more thrilling.” Anyone with his nerve and total lack of taste is sooner or later going to make a movie worth seeing.” It failed, but it has not left me convinced that Tom Green doesn’t have good work in him. And for all its sins, it was at least an ambitious movie, a go-for-broke attempt to accomplish something. “But the thing is, I remember ‘Freddy Got Fingered’ more than a year later. This movie doesn’t deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.”īut after watching Green in “Stealing Harvard” a year later, Ebert revisited the film that he had awarded a rare zero stars: This movie isn’t below the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn’t the bottom of the barrel. “This movie doesn’t scrape the bottom of the barrel. – A good example of Ebert’s willingness to keep an open mind comes from his review of Tom Green’s 2001 comedy “Freddy Got Fingered” of which he wrote one of his most scathing reviews: I would far rather praise the next film to show that I maintained an open mind.” Sometimes when I write a negative review, people will say, ‘I’ll bet you can’t wait to hammer his next film.’ Not true. It was a reminder that in the great scheme of things, a review doesn’t mean very much. “The bouquet didn’t change my opinion of his movie, but I don’t think he intended that,” Ebert wrote. Two years later, flowers showed up at Ebert’s door with a card, signed “Your Least Favorite Movie Star, Rob Schneider.” Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Therefore, Goldstein is not qualified to complain that Columbia financed “Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo” while passing on the opportunity to participate in “Million Dollar Baby,” “Ray,” “The Aviator,” “Sideways” and “Finding Neverland.” As chance would have it, I have won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. – Concerning Schneider’s reaction to another critic who panned the film: “But Schneider is correct, and Patrick Goldstein has not yet won a Pulitzer Prize. ![]() – About Rob Schneider’s “Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo” in 2005: “If he’s going to persist in making bad movies, he’s going to – have to grow accustomed to reading bad reviews.” “I must slow down now, which is why I’m taking what I like to call ‘a leave of presence.’”Įbert: The critical critic with an open mindĮbert, who won a Pulitzer Prize for film criticism in 1975, had a way with words and a sharp wit that is not easily matched. “Last year, I wrote the most of my career, including 306 movie reviews, a blog post or two a week, and assorted other articles,” he said. The last year however, was his most prolific. He suffered a hip fracture in December, and it recently led to the revelations about cancer, he said.Įbert started as the Sun-Times film critic on April 3, 1967, writing about 200 reviews each of those 46 years, he said. Ebert had already lost his voice and much of his jaw after battling thyroid and salivary gland cancer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |